Re: SW

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Previous # Next ] [ Start New Thread ] [ TarBoard ]

Posted by Mike Jones on July 28, 2015 at 13:08:46 user Mike_Jones.

In Reply to: Re: SW posted by John Nichols on July 28, 2015 at 05:31:02:

I see what you mean. The legible SW x W is on the 240 degree mark; the questionable one is on the 233 degree mark, which is SW 3/4 W. I would struggle to read the blob between SW and W as 3/4, but again, I would struggle to read it as anything!

Follow Ups:

Re: SW John 07/28/15 (28)
- Re: SW Mike Jones 07/29/15 (27)
  - Re: SW Alan Hakim 07/29/15 (26)
    - Re: SW Mike Jones 07/29/15 (25)
      - Re: SW Roger Wardale 07/29/15 (24)
        
        Re: SW Mike Field 07/29/15 (23)
        
        Re: SW John Nichols 07/30/15 (22)
        
        Re: SW Mike Jones 07/30/15 (21)
        
        Re: SW Roger Wardale 07/30/15 (20)
        
        Re: SW John Nichols 07/31/15 (18)
        
        Re: SW Roger Wardale 08/01/15 (17)
        
        Re: SW John Nichols 08/02/15 (16)
        
        Re: SW & GN Peter Ceresole 08/05/15 (15)
        
        Re: SW & GN Tom Naapier 08/05/15 (14)
        
        Re: SW & GN Peter Ceresole 08/05/15 (13)
        
        Re: SW & GN Tom Napier 08/06/15 (2)
        
        Re: SW & GN Jon 08/07/15 (1)
        
        Re: SW & GN Tom Napier 08/07/15 (0)
        
        Re: SW & GN Mike Dennis 08/06/15 (9)
        
        Re: SW & GN Magnus Smith 08/07/15 (0)
        
        Re: SW & GN Alan Hakim 08/06/15 (7)
        
        Re: SW & GN Roger Wardale 08/08/15 (6)
        
        Re: SW & GN Jon 08/09/15 (5)
        
        Re: SW & GN Alan Hakim 08/09/15 (4)
        
        Re: SW & GN Jon 08/10/15 (3)
        
        Re: SW & GN Alan Hakim 08/10/15 (2)
        
        Re: SW & GN Jon 08/10/15 (1)
        
        Re: SW & GN Roger Wardale 08/11/15 (0)
        
        Re: SW John Nichols 07/31/15 (0)

Post a followup (Only if you agree to the Terms and Conditions )